Follow Spill!

Latest Activity

Seth "Spicolli" posted a status
"Lil Wayne is a disgrace after this stomping on the flag scene!"
44 minutes ago
Christ-ian The Jew posted a status
"Man, any country music that isn't Johnny Cash, Hank Williams, Willie Nelson, and Dolly Parton sucks dick."
1 hour ago
The true Bohemian posted a status
"Father in-law got into argument with mother in-law. Which made me get into an argument with the wife... haha such a strange experience"
1 hour ago
Theredknite posted a status
"I have a question, would it be a good direction for DC to take their heroes and make them into "Oscar Worthy" films?"
1 hour ago
Profile IconTAGibby4 and Jack O'mally joined Colin Gillespie's group
Thumbnail

Steam

For people you love Steam for Valve games join and put your names in
1 hour ago
Derek posted photos
2 hours ago
That Guy Jv posted a status
"I have to go see Man of Steel. First time I saw it, two ghetto black girls kept talking during the first half of the movie :/"
2 hours ago
Kamen Rider Scorch posted photos
2 hours ago

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

Music

Loading…

This is just a sort of short review on the movie NEDs, which I saw last night.

 

NEDs is, in short a coming-of-age story of a smart youngster in Glasgow. Directed and written by Peter Mullan, an actor turned-director known for playing roles such as Syd in Children of Men and Swanney in Trainspotting, tells the story of John McGill (played by Gregg Forrest and Conor McCarron respectively) as he grows up around the different people of 1970s Glasgow. 

 

Most prevalent of these different people in the movie are the NEDs, or 'Non-educated delinquents' in the language of the school system. Now, this movie could have been condemning of them, or it could have gone the other way. But it didn't. It portrayed pretty much everything with as much raw realism as was appropriate, and even the pretty much constant swearing (by swearing I mean things like 'fuck this or this fucking whatever', and people calling each other cunts from the the start), didn't seem to detract from the feeling of rawness in the movie at all. From the NEDs' behaviour in school to that in and around their own and other gangs, Mullan and the great cast of actors get the script and performances spot-on.

 

The result of this collaboration is a very dark mood, and a tense atmosphere throughout. Also, the whole 70s thing isn't overplayed at all, whilst still being very prominent in the film at the same time. However, as much as I've praised this movie, it does also have a few downfalls. Firstly, towards the end, the film seems to unnecessarily take longer than it should to reach its conclusion. Not too long to where it takes you out of the movie or anything, but it definitely could have been shortened by about 10 or 15 minutes. Also, around the last 20 minutes of the film, it gets a little weaker as the movie's spark starts to die out. Then, after the spark has died out, and the movie should have finished, it finally stumbles uncertainly to the end. I'm not saying it was a bad conclusion or anything, but it definitely could have come sooner. 

 

NEDS is a powerful film, with great performances all-round and a brilliant script. But, the violence or the frequent swearing may put off some people, and I'd also advise to beware that this is not a happy movie at all. While I have heard that there is some black comedy is this, (and come to think of it I think I can remember that now) this film will stay with you after you watch it. It is an almost-excessively dark film, yet hard-hitting and relevant to today. I give this film a good low full price. A good full price because it's definitely worth watching or buying, but low because of the faults detailed in the review.  

 

Views: 39

Tags: review

Comment

You need to be a member of The Spill Movie Community to add comments!

Join The Spill Movie Community

Comment by TheBoogieMan on June 16, 2011 at 12:19pm
Yeah my thoughts exactly. Thanks, I should've put some of that in the review, like how towards the end John felt quite distant, and also the 'never being bored' bit. That would''ve sounded good at the end of the review, to sort of summarise it a bit.
Comment by Chilly on June 16, 2011 at 12:09pm
Yeah good review, I do remember the film dragging a bit towards the end, my main problem with the film as I've said before was the main character feeling distant at times, like he wasn't all their, mind you i've met plenty of neds who have similar personalities but he was supposed to be really smart. Other than this as you said the film is incredibly raw, part of the reasoning behind this is that there are very few professional actors in the film, this creates an almost documentary feel. Up until the last 15 or so minutes I was never bored, I was taken in by the realism and tension, I love sinking into films and this film achieved that.
Comment by TheBoogieMan on June 14, 2011 at 1:45pm
Cool thanks for the criticism, yeah I thought after writing it I probably needed to put something in there more interesting like a joke, rather than lots of bland analysis. You should see it, you can probably rent it in Blockbuster or buy it there or HMV. I'll read some more reviews from different critics though before I do another review.
Comment by Paul Emmanuel on June 14, 2011 at 1:10pm
This is better than your Mongol review man. Nice keeping the synopsis down as well. Very clear and straight to the point. A little short for my liking but oh well, who gives a shit anyway. Maybe add some humour in to keep the audience engrossed. But I enjoyed it and would also like to see Neds as well, so I think you've suceeded there. Keep it up man.

© 2013   Created by The Spill Crew.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service