If it's crap ... We'll tell you
In the review for "A Good Old Fashioned Orgy" the guys said a few things that puzzled me, in response a grown man privately making some lewd comments about a good looking underage(<18) girl.
Co Host: "Now they just seem creepy and [kinda] perverted"
Korey: "I almost walked out"
Leon: "Locked up"
All this from porn fans. Come on [fellas], let's be consistent. You mean to tell me that being sexually attracted to a mature looking female that hasn't reached their 18th birthday is perverted, but watching naked strangers having sex isn't.
I'm not even getting on porn.
It's just that if she was 19 (or a "college girl") then it would be okay I guess because a group of people in D.C. said so.
It was a good review, as usual, but the guys often lose me with the wavering moral stances.
What do you think?
The arbitrary age restriction on sex is a modern development. It's not natural since women sexually mature at different ages and men are wired to be sexually attracted to sexually mature (post pubescent) women which can happen at many ages prior to 18. What's the actual difference between a 17 year old woman a month before her 18th birthday and that same woman the day she turns 18? Essentially nothing except the legal ability to fuck her. I know damn well that every man on this site has at one point or another been sexually attracted to a woman whose body was sexually mature who wasn't yet 18.
Sexy 17 year old women turn gay men bi.
No, they really dont.
I've known 17 year-olds who were more adult than 90% of all the women over 18 I have ever met.
Most, if not all, of Europe has an age of consent ranging from 13-17. A countries' age of consent is an arbitrary number from the standpoint of sexual attraction and is based purely on societal/cultural values.